Jump to content

Job_van_gennip

Dormant
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    193

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Job_van_gennip

  1. Job_van_gennip
    Nee dat is natuurlijk altijd waar, merk gewoon vanuit waar ik werk dat ze vaak meteen geïnstalleerd worden en goed onderhouden worden daarom dacht ik zal je even informeren.
  2. Job_van_gennip
    Ik denk niet dat je veel losse onderdelen gaat vinden omdat het gewoon een heel pakket is met een stappen plan om te installeren. Ben dus bang dat als je graag zou willen upgraden je moet gaan kijken naar een heated bed upgrade. Of je moet heel veel geluk hebben natuurlijk
  3. Job_van_gennip
    Ik zou zelf echt gewoon overstappen op een ander materiaal. Bij het bedrijf waar ik werk wissel ik heel de dag door tussen ultimaker materiaal en ons eigen materiaal en we gebrijken gewoon altijd dezelfde instelling echt geen probleem. Denk dit dat voor de meeste pla's geldt. Ik zou wel oppassen met chinees fillament maar trideus lay3rs colorfab is sowieso echt wel goed.
  4. Job_van_gennip
    Could you try with 0,35 first this is the standard setting. And could you then post a picture of the result. Also print with skirt or brim
  5. Job_van_gennip
    I have experience with both scan in the box (around 3000 euro high resolution scanning) and the 3D sense scanner (400 euro low resolution hand held scanning) and both of them work really well. It really depends on how much detail you want. If you want more than 1mm resolution never go for handheld scanners although they are easy to work with and ideal for big products they will not give high resolution scans. Scan in the box delivers the high resolution scanner with software, it does need some getting used to but we have had some amazing results with it up to 0.1mm resolution ideal for product reproduction.
  6. Job_van_gennip
    No you need to get a good value for this, normally it is 80% of your nozzle diameter or something. But this could cause impurities.
  7. Job_van_gennip
    You can get the setting by clicking on the little gear wheel, here you can enable extra settings.
  8. Job_van_gennip
    Yeah if the bottom has the same problem it will probably have to do with the extrusion with
  9. Job_van_gennip
    You have a support setting that decides the distance your support has between the prints. The higher this number the uglier your print gets but the easier it is to take away. Have you looked at the amounts.
  10. Job_van_gennip
    Have you tried printing them with a brim or skirt and seeing if you get the same problems?
  11. Job_van_gennip
    The setting look good, does it print the bottom right?
  12. Job_van_gennip
    Could you send me your settings? Especially the infill and top bottom thickness
  13. Job_van_gennip
    Could you post your settings? It looks like it is maybe extruding a little bit too much.
  14. Job_van_gennip
    Have you taken out the material before trying to take out the print core? sometime the material has not retracted enough and is still stuck in the print core.
  15. Job_van_gennip
    @Nicolinux Do you think it could be in wrong but still make contact well enough for the printcore to connect? Cause i assumed that was not possible and that is why i ignored the position of the print core.
  16. Job_van_gennip
    are you squeezing the print core a little bit when you try to take it out? there is a spring in there that is supposed to keep everything in place. The reason printcore 2 is lower is because when it is the the heightened position the print core is blocked.
  17. Job_van_gennip
    But cant you just download the new version of your nvidia drivers (i guess it is nvidia)
  18. Job_van_gennip
    I also had this problem for a while and sometimes things like this helped temporarily, but for me updating the drivers of my graphics card was what truly did the trick. Of course it could be that your error came from another source.
  19. Job_van_gennip
    But did you also try exporting it as an stl?
  20. Job_van_gennip
    I tried to open it as well and i get exactly the same failure. So it is in the model for sure, i am however no expert in inventor so only thing i could think of is saving as an stl and try again.
  21. Job_van_gennip
    Bedoel je dat alles wat je op de printer doet de hoogte wel klopt maar als je print via cura het niet meer klopt? Dit zou te maken kunnen hebben met het print profiel zorg dat je de ultimaker orginal hebt geselecteerd en niet de umo+ deze hebben namelijk volgens mij een andere hoogte (weet ik niet zeker). Kijk ook even of je heated bed hebt aangevinkt want dat hoort niet.
  22. Job_van_gennip
    Heb je ervoor gezorgd dat je tijdens het papiertje ertussen doen niet op de bouwplaat hangt? Dit doen namelijk heel veel mensen en dat kan als snel een mm schelen. Verder kun je proberen even je bouwplaat eruit halen schroeven naar helemaal onder zetten en nieuwe tape erop. Vervolgens weer even opnieuw levelen dit moet vaak de truc wel doen.
  23. Job_van_gennip
    Have you already tried maybe lowering the temperature? It really looks like overextrusion. It does not look like a retraction problem since it is all over the print and not just on one place in the model. Try to print in a few different temps maybe as low as 195. It could really be the fillament that you use.
  24. Job_van_gennip
    Can you post your settings like speed, temp etc.
  25. Job_van_gennip
    Haha love it when you put it in those numbers.
×
×
  • Create New...